IT Diligence
The High Cost of the IT P&L: How Avoidable IT OpEx Destroys Enterprise Value
At typical middle-market exit multiples of 6x–9x EBITDA, every $100k of avoidable IT OpEx destroys $600k–$900k of enterprise value. Replacing recurring IT drag with durable platforms protects run-rate EBITDA and defends exit multiples.
Most operators still view IT modernization as a cost of doing business. In private equity, how that spend shows up in the financials can materially affect exit outcomes.
The financial mechanics behind IT spend and why reducing recurring IT OpEx, and capitalizing what legitimately qualifies, is one of the cleanest ways to protect EBITDA and defend your enterprise value.
At typical middle-market exit multiples of 6x–9x EBITDA, every $100k of avoidable IT OpEx destroys $600k–$900k of enterprise value.
When I look at portfolio companies, I am not chasing transformation for its own sake. I am looking for IT spending that quietly depresses sustainable EBITDA and creates friction for buyers.
The P&L trap
PE firms focus on EBITDA because buyers care about durable, repeatable earnings. When IT is managed purely as a cost center, recurring “keep-the-lights-on” spend becomes a structural drag on valuation.
Protecting the exit starts with changing how IT economics are evaluated.
1. Identifying the real EBITDA drains
The problem is rarely just slow systems or weak automation. Those are symptoms. The real issue is recurring cost required to sustain inefficient processes:
*Legacy maintenance: Ongoing contracts for systems that should have been retired
*Redundant licensing: Multiple tools doing the same job across unintegrated acquisitions
*The manual labor tax: Oversized teams propping up manual workflows and “Bob’s Excel,” where critical business logic lives outside core systems
2. Investing to eliminate run-rate OpEx
One of the most effective levers an operating partner has is replacing recurring OpEx with durable fixes. Instead of spending $200k every year on manual reconciliation, you fund a properly scoped automation or system rebuild.
Under GAAP, some build costs may qualify for capitalization when documented correctly, but the real value is not accounting optics. It is the permanent removal of recurring expense from the P&L, with depreciation that is far less punitive to EBITDA than ongoing labor and maintenance.
You fix the plumbing, improve scalability, and clean up run-rate earnings.
3. Building for the buyer
Buyers do not want to inherit a business held together by manual workarounds and fragile processes. They want a platform that scales without adding cost.
When modernization is executed with financial discipline, it improves operational reality and tells a cleaner story in diligence. Lower run-rate OpEx, clearer capitalization, and fewer EBITDA addbacks all support a stronger multiple.
The goal is not to spend less on IT. The goal is to spend in ways that remove recurring drag so each dollar invested protects, and often amplifies, enterprise value.
